new_0007s_0000_Climate-change
new_0005s_0000_Starfish
new_0003s_0000_Storms
new_0001s_0000_Ships

What are the causes?

> Climate change?

> Starfish?

> Storms?

> Ships?

new_0000s_0001_Buoysmall
new_0000s_0000_Buoylight
new_0001_Frame-4
new_0000_Frame-5
new_0010_Frame-2
new_0006_Frame-2

“We have to stop
coal exports to
save the Reef”

new_0002_Frame-9
new_0001_Frame-10
The scientific consensus says 48% of damage is caused by storms, 42% by the crown-of-thorns starfish, & 10% by bleaching linked to climate change.
new_0005_Frame-4
new_0002_Frame-7
new_0003_Frame-6
new_0004_Frame-5
new_0010_Frame-2
new_0006_Frame-2

“With 5x the number
of ships, dugongs
and humpbacks
better look where
they are going”

new_0002_Frame-9
new_0001_Frame-10
The ports occupy a fraction of 1% of the marine park, and there will be 2x the number of ships at most, so the whales can relax
money3
money2
money1
money4
cats
new_0010_Frame-2
new_0006_Frame-2

“Greedy billionaire
fat cats and global
corporations want
to sacrifice the Reef
to pursue profits”

new_0002_Frame-9
new_0001_Frame-10
Science confirms the coal ports are not the threat to the Reef. The Reef is most at risk from farmers not 'fat cats’.

Help save the Reef
and spread the word

new_0010s_0001_Buoy
new_0010s_0000_Layer-6-copy
GBReecutf
new_0011s_0000_BUT-WHY_
new_0010s_0001_Buoy
new_0010s_0000_Layer-6-copy
new_0003_Traffic-light--copy-2
new_0007_Frame-5
boats2
new_0011_Frame-1
new_0010_Frame-2
new_0009_Frame-3

“Expansion of ports
will mean a coal
superhighway of
10,000 ships over
the Reef by the end
of the decade”

white_line
new_0003_Traffic-light--copy-3
new_0002_Frame-9
new_0001_Frame-10
The port company’s highest estimate is 4,000 ships and it is likely to be significantly less.

We all want to “save the reef”

The coal export industry is vital to the Australian economy, but not at any price. There are legitimate concerns that increased development of the ports in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park area will endanger marine life, upset aquatic ecosystems and cause pollution. It is often overlooked that the coal industry shares these concerns and is committed to a cautious approach to development informed by scientific research and best practice. According to commentators, the industry has consistently worked to meet and exceed guidelines and best practice in this are of outstanding heritage. The reef is afforded robust protection from the Australian State Governments as well as international law to ensure that development comes with minimal impact.

The industry has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment to scientific input and evidence-based research. Developers have responded to tight regulation and committed themselves to the protection of the reef by developing innovative practices that minimise impact and exceed international guidelines. In response to concerns – some justified, some alarmist – the sector produced a voluntary, peer-reviewed environmental impact study that concluded that the increase in shipping needed to support the export industry would not pose a significant threat to the Great Barrier Reef area.

Alarmist predictions based on inaccuracies and exaggerations are unhelpful and add nothing to the ongoing debate on how best to marry Australia’s economic interests and our protection of the environment. Putting the area at risk through thoughtless development or recklessness does no one any good. The truth is that thanks to robust legislation, proactive management and a commitment to minimal impact, the coal export industry can safely use the ports without endangering the Great Barrier Reef.